Watch film and then write the critical views of the film Essay

Watch film and then write the critical views of the film - Essay theoretical accountThe Future of Food tends to explain in a systematic and organized manner as to how the much praised cat valium Revolution had a debilitating settle on the small farmers and how it benefitted the large corporations. The objective of the super C Revolution was to facilitate a massive increase in the overall production of crops in the poor people or developing nations by promoting an extensive use of high damping varieties of crops, chemical pesticides and artificial fertilizers (Belasco 116). The basic objective of Green Revolution was to make demeanor for a larger production of food crops that could help the poor nations deal with the long pending issues like hunger and mal-nutrition. However, it is sad to say that though Green Revolution did help the developing nations to some extent, yet the economics of Green Revolution was primarily hijacked by the big multinational pesticide and fertilizer p roducers. The high yield varieties of crops were so modified that they worked only when treated with specific fertilizers and pesticides (Belasco 116). Thereby, this approach towards Green Revolution eventually ended up filling the coffers of large multinational corporations transaction in pesticides and fertilizers. However, it will be true to say that The Future of Food was very constrained about how Green Revolution did benefit large consequence of hungry and mal-nourished people around the world.The other ironic revelation extended by The Future of Food is that going by the fact that the economics of Green Revolution was skewed in favor of powerful multinational corporations and rich farmers, it negatively impacted the small framers the world over and diluted their role in the larger food economics (Belasco 116). Though, industrial farming aimed to produce massive quantities of crops, on a large scale by resorting to the usage of modern technology and by influencing the econom ics and politics of food at an international level, yet, actually speaking